The Federal Rules of Evidence provide the guidelines about what information can be presented during a hearing or trial. Review the Federal Rules of Evidence and explain how courts determine what types of information can be used and what the lawyers must do to get evidence admitted? Using LexisAdvance or Fastcase, compare the Federal Rules of Evidence to the Rules of Evidence in your state. Is there a difference between the two in terms of the types of information that are considered “evidence,” or the steps a lawyer must take for evidence to be admitted? Be sure to address real or physical evidence, documentary evidence, testimonial evidence and judicial notice.

Please limit yourself to ONE type of evidence (physical or documentary or testimonial or judicial notice).

300 words

refs n cite

preview of the answer..

The Federal rules of evidence are a codification of the law of evidence that applies in the federal courts of the United States. The adoption of the rules by the United States is done using variations or without and they are revised using codes and rules to ensure that they are adhered with. The law of evidence helps in the governing of the facts that proof the lawsuits that people …

388 words APA