Define and explain nursing informatics and highlight the role of a nurse leader as a knowledge worker.
Define and explain nursing informatics and highlight the role of a nurse leader as a knowledge worker.
The Nurse Leader as a Knowledge Worker
Hi all,
Welcome to Week 2!
To clarify, the week 2 assignment is a PowerPoint presentation that includes the scenario you used in the discussion forum during Week 1. It is only a PowerPoint but one slide should include the infographic created to express the concepts of the assignment (explain nursing informatics and highlight the role of a nurse leader as a knowledge worker).
The discussion for Week 1 will be graded separately. However, you need to include parts and elements from the discussion into the PowerPoint. It builds upon the Week 1 discussion.
I have attached a copy of student example for the Week 2 assignment in the DOC SHARING folder. ***It is very important that you not copy or use this presentation as it has been submitted to the University and will show up in the similarity checker.
I’ve attached the grading rubric below the instructions for the assignment. Always look to the grading rubrics for additional focus on what is expected and how the work will be assessed.
The Assignment has 3 parts:
- Explain the concept of a knowledge worker.
Define and explain nursing informatics and highlight the role of a nurse leader as a knowledge worker.
- Develop a simple infographic to help explain these concepts.NOTE: For guidance on infographics, including how to create one in PowerPoint, see “How to Make an Infographic in PowerPoint” as presented in the Resources.
- Present the hypothetical scenario you originally shared in the Discussion Forum. Include your examination of the data that you could use, how the data might be accessed/collected, and what knowledge might be derived from that data. Be sure to incorporate feedback received from your colleagues’ replies.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Best, Dr. Howe
Rubric Detail
Name: NURS_5051_Module01_Week02_Assignment_Rubric
| Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | ||
| Develop a 5- to 6-slide PowerPointpresentation that addresses the following: · Explain the concept of a knowledge worker. | 32 (32%) – 35 (35%) The presentation clearly and accurately explains the concept of a knowledge worker. The presentation clearly and accurately defines and explains nursing informatics with a detailed explanation of the role of the nurse leader as a knowledge worker. Includes: 3 or more peer-reviewed sources and 2 or more course resources. | 28 (28%) – 31 (31%) The presentation explains the concept of a knowledge worker. The presentation defines and explains nursing informatics with an explanation of the role of the nurse leader as a knowledge worker. Includes: 2 peer-reviewed sources and 2 course resources. | 25 (25%) – 27 (27%) The presentation inaccurately or vaguely explains the concept of a knowledge worker. The presentation inaccurately or vaguely defines and explains nursing informatics with an inaccurate or vague explanation of the role of the nurse leader as a knowledge worker. Includes: 1 peer-reviewed sources and 1 course resources. | 0 (0%) – 24 (24%) The presentation inaccurately and vaguely explains the concept of a knowledge worker or is missing. The presentation inaccurately and vaguely defines and explains nursing informatics with an inaccurate and vague explanation of the role of the nurse leader as a knowledge worker or is missing. Includes: 1 or fewer resources. | |
| · Develop a simple infographic to help explain these concepts. | 14 (14%) – 15 (15%) The presentation provides an accurate and detailed infographic that helps explain the concepts related to the presentation. | 12 (12%) – 13 (13%) The presentation provides aninfographic that helps explain the concepts related to the presentation. | 11 (11%) – 11 (11%) The presentation provides an infographic related to the concepts of the presentation that is inaccurate or vague. | 0 (0%) – 10 (10%) The infographic provided in the presentation related to the concepts of the presentation is inaccurate and vague, or is missing. | |
| · Present the hypothetical scenario you originally shared in the Discussion Forum. Include your examination of the data you could use, how the data might be accessed/collected, and what knowledge might be derived from the data. Be sure to incorporate feedback received from your colleagues’ replies. | 32 (32%) – 35 (35%) The presentation clearly and thoroughly includes the hypothetical scenario originally shared in the Discussion Forum, including a detailed and accurate examination of the data used, how the data might be accessed/collected, and the knowledge that could be derived from the data. | 28 (28%) – 31 (31%) The presentation includes the hypothetical scenario originally shared in the Discussion Forum, including an accurate examination of the data used, how the data might be accessed/collected, and the knowledge that could be derived from the data. | 25 (25%) – 27 (27%) The presentation includes the hypothetical scenario originally shared in the Discussion Forum, including an examination of the data used, how the data might be accessed/collected, and the knowledge that could be derived from the data that is vague or inaccurate. | 0 (0%) – 24 (24%) The presentation includes the hypothetical scenario originally shared in the Discussion Forum, including an examination of the data used, how the data might be accessed/collected, and the knowledge that could be derived from the data that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing. | |
| Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. | 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. | 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. | 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%- 79% of the time. | 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. | |
| Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation | 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. | 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. | 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. | 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with t he reader’s understanding. | |
| Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. | 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Uses correct APA format with no errors. | 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors. | 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Contains several (3-4) APA format errors. | 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. | |
| Total Points: 100 | |||||
Subject: Masters Nursing
Answer preview……………………………….
8 slides