Discuss the idea that morality incorporates “agent-centered restrictions” (or deontological constraints). Compare and contrast the defenses of such restrictions implicit in Foot’s “natural goodness” approach and in Wallace’s relational view.
Discuss the idea that morality incorporates “agent-centered restrictions” (or deontological constraints). Compare and contrast the defenses of such restrictions implicit in Foot’s “natural goodness” approach and in Wallace’s relational view.
our writing should be crisp and clear, and it should argue for a point of view. Your aim should be to reconstruct and engage with the views of the authors you are discussing, not just to report what those authors say. A particular challenge will be to develop a continuous argument (rather than a sequence of episodic commentaries on three or four different philosophers that are not tightly connected to each other). Back up your claims with brief quotations or references to the texts (page numbers may be given in parentheses within the body of your paper).
Papers should be about 8 pages long (typed and double-spaced). In no case should they be longer than 2,500 words
Topic
Discuss the idea that morality incorporates “agent-centered restrictions” (or deontological constraints). Compare and contrast the defenses of such restrictions implicit in Foot’s “natural goodness” approach and in Wallace’s relational view. Do these authors succeed in defending agent-centered restrictions against Scheffler’s suggestion that they are inherently paradoxical?
Book
https://oxford.universitypressscholarship.com/view/10.1093/0198235089.001.0001/acprof-9780198235088
You don’t need to finish it quickly, I hope you can spend more time reading Foot’s “natural goodness” and writing in combination with Scheffler’s pdf file. The title also mentioned Wallace’s relational view. I didn’t find the pdf file for this. I hope you can check it on the Internet.
Requirements: | .doc file | MLA | Essay | 8 pages, Double spaced
Answer preview “Discuss the idea that morality incorporates “agent-centered restrictions” (or deontological constraints). Compare and contrast the defenses of such restrictions implicit in Foot’s “natural goodness” approach and in Wallace’s relational view.” essay………………..
apa 2540 words