Read the “Sidebar 20.6” in Ch. 20 of the text.

Write paper of 850–words in which you analyze the sexual harassment issues presented in the scenario.

Analyze each of the elements of this case, the applicable defenses and the basis for the court’s ruling.
Analyze the possible liability in this case if the sexual harasser(s) were an independent contractor versus an employee.

Cite to at least three peer-reviewed sources.

Format your paper consistent with APA guidelines.

U can google the case for more info

http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-11th-circuit/1387323.html

preview of the answer..

Vulgar language can be considered as sexual harassment based on the context under which it is used. In the case of Reeves, there are different aspects to consider before concluding whether the language permeating her office was sexual harassment or not. The first element to consider is the fact that the language used was not directed at her and therefore does not warrant to harassment. According to Title VII of the harassment act, sexual discrimination occurs when it is specific to race, sex, religion or a group of people (Parker, 2008). In this case, both males and females in the office have been exposed to the same offensive language and hence not specific to any sex. The based on element further unveils that Reeves case does not warrant …

945 words APA