Formulate appropriate procedures and techniques to maintain the value and admissibility of evidence
Formulate appropriate procedures and techniques to maintain the value and admissibility of evidence
COURSE OBJECTIVES AND STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES FOR THIS ASSIGNMENT
1 Formulate appropriate procedures and techniques to maintain the value and admissibility of evidence;
2 Identify, critically analyze, and develop solutions to evidentiary problems;
3 Utilize technology appropriate to the discipline;
4 Compose written reports for case file inclusion and courtroom presentation;
5 Demonstrate ability to work collaboratively in a group setting
Requirements: pages
Subject: Criminal Justice
I will provide you will all the information needed below:
For this assignment, you will brief a real-world, high-profile case (list of approved cases is on next page) using concepts from the text. You will use the text and provided prompts to brief items of evidentiary value from your case. This assignment will be graded using the Case Brief rubric.
WHAT TO DO
- Review all material in this module and related materials
- Conduct proper library research to learn more about the case
the case is going to be about ” O.J. Simpson murder trail”
PLEASE INCLUDE THESE IN THE SUBMISSION
- Victim name
- Defendant name
- Witness(es) (limit to two primary witnesses)
- Description of crime
- Prosecution’s Case: Testimonial and Real Evidence provided in court – list the main testimonial and real evidence presented by the Prosecutor. List the witnesses and what testimonial evidence they provided. List the real (physical evidence) and discuss if the evidence was direct or circumstantial; discuss if any scientific evidence was presented and describe it BE VERY DETAILED!
- Defense Case: Was there a main argument (main theme) that the defense used? Testimonial and Real Evidence provided in court – list the main testimonial and real evidence presented by the Defense. List the witnesses and what testimonial evidence they provided. List the real (physical evidence) and discuss if the evidence was direct or circumstantial; discuss if any scientific evidence was presented and describe it BE VERY DETAILED! Please describe.
2 hours ago
All submissions will have a short reference list with at least two additional sources, referenced in APA format
Evidence of Group CollaborationClear evidence of group working with each other to achieve goal. |
|
12 pts | ||
Crime Description |
|
9 pts | ||
Prosecution case evidence list |
|
9 pts | ||
Defense case evidence list |
|
9 pts | ||
Intent proven |
|
9 pts | ||
Search and seizure |
|
9 pts | ||
Suspect identification |
|
9 pts | ||
Circumstantial evidence of guilt |
|
9 pts | ||
Hearsay exceptions |
|
9 pts | ||
Privileged communications |
|
9 pts | ||
Reasonable doubt |
|
9 pts | ||
Remarkable facts |
|
9 pts | ||
Different approach |
|
9 pts | ||
Additional questions |
|
5 pts |
Answer preview for the “Formulate appropriate procedures and techniques to maintain the value and admissibility of evidence” essay……………………….
apa 1936 words