How are alternative or non-normative visions of intimacy challenging or “rewriting” dominant ideas of “intelligible” intimacy?
How are alternative or non-normative visions of intimacy challenging or “rewriting” dominant ideas of “intelligible” intimacy?
This week’s readings discuss how public institutions, spaces, and concerns impact visions of what a “proper” intimate life can look like. For this week’s forum, answer both of the following questions using specific examples from the readings: (about 500 words post)
- How are alternative or non-normative visions of intimacy challenging or “rewriting” dominant ideas of “intelligible” intimacy?
- How do seemingly “atypical” spaces of intimacy (dating apps, sex work and transactional intimacy, etc.) reveal complexities of intimacy? How do they compare to conventional lessons on how intimacy “should” work?
You should use citations from at least two of this week’s readings.
You must properly cite the readings to receive full credit. Citations should look like this: (Garcia 61) or (Garcia 2012, 61), for example. If you are paraphrasing a very general idea in the reading, you do not need to include a page number. However, direct quotes always require citations, and paraphrases of very specific ideas should have citations as well. (Paraphrases can be harder to know when to cite, so being extra cautious may help take off some of the stress.)
subject: Masters Gender Studies
Answer preview for the “How are alternative or non-normative visions of intimacy challenging or “rewriting” dominant ideas of “intelligible” intimacy?” essay……………………
apa 573 words