This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProject Charter |
20.0 to >18.0 ptsExcellent
The 11 elements of the project charter are clearly described and all the questions in the assignment have been addressed. |
18.0 to >16.0 ptsCompetent
Most of the 11 elements of the project charter have been described and/or most of the questions in the assignments have been addressed. |
16.0 to >14.0 ptsFair
Some elements of the project charter have been described clearly and/or some but not all of the questions in the assignment have been addressed. |
14.0 to >12.0 ptsPoor
The project charter does not contain most of the 11 elements and/or most of the questions have not been addressed appropriately. |
12.0 to >0 ptsUnacceptable
The project charter is missing, only a few of the 11 elements and/or the questions have been addressed. |
|
20.0 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScope Statement |
15.0 to >14.0 ptsExcellent
The scope of the project is clearly defined and the 10 elements of the scope statement are addressed with appropriate detail. |
14.0 to >12.0 ptsCompetent
The scope of the project is defined but one or two of the elements of the scope statement are not addressed with adequate detail. |
12.0 to >10.0 ptsFair
The scope of the project is defined but many elements of the scope statement are not addressed with adequate detail. |
10.0 to >9.0 ptsPoor
The scope statement is not defined well and/or most of the elements of the scope statement are not addressed with adequate detail. |
9.0 to >0 ptsUnacceptable
The scope statement is missing or only contains a few of the elements. |
|
15.0 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWork Breakdown Structure (WBS) |
15.0 to >14.0 ptsExcellent
The work breakdown structure (WBS) is created in MS Project, contains at least 50 items, and is three levels deep. |
14.0 to >12.0 ptsCompetent
The WBS is created in MS Project and contains most of the required items and/or is three levels deep. |
12.0 to >10.0 ptsFair
The WBS is created in MS Project, contains some of the required items and/or is three levels deep. |
10.0 to >9.0 ptsPoor
The WBS is created in MS Project, contains few of the required items and/or contains fewer than three levels. |
9.0 to >0 ptsUnacceptable
The WBS is not created in MS Project or is missing. |
|
15.0 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeBudget and Resource Allocation Plan |
20.0 to >18.0 ptsExcellent
The project budget contains the four elements described in the assignment and resources are allocated for all applicable activities. |
18.0 to >16.0 ptsCompetent
Most of the four elements of the project budget are described or some resources are not allocated for all the applicable activities. |
16.0 to >14.0 ptsFair
Most of the four elements of the project budget are not described or many resources are not allocated for the applicable activities. |
14.0 to >12.0 ptsPoor
The project budget does not contain appropriate detail for the elements or most resources are not allocated for the applicable activities. |
12.0 to >0 ptsUnacceptable
The project budget is missing or very few of the required elements are present. |
|
20.0 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRisk Management Plan |
15.0 to >14.0 ptsExcellent
The risk register contains at least 20 risks and all the elements of the risk register are completed for the risks. |
14.0 to >12.0 ptsCompetent
The risk register contains most of the required risks and/or some elements of the risk register not completed. |
12.0 to >10.0 ptsFair
The risk register contains some of the required risks and/or many elements of the risk register are not completed. |
10.0 to >9.0 ptsPoor
The risk register very few of the required risks and/or most elements are not completed on the risk register. |
9.0 to >0 ptsUnacceptable
The risk register is missing or only has a few risks that are not addressed completely. |
|
15.0 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStakeholder Management Plan |
15.0 to >14.0 ptsExcellent
All stakeholders are identified for the project and the stakeholder management plan contains all required elements. |
14.0 to >12.0 ptsCompetent
The stakeholder management plan contains most of the required elements for the listed stakeholders. |
12.0 to >10.0 ptsFair
The stakeholder management plan contains some of the required elements for the listed stakeholders. |
10.0 to >9.0 ptsPoor
Only a few stakeholders are listed and most of the elements required for the stakeholder management plan are missing. |
9.0 to >0 ptsUnacceptable
The stakeholder management plan is absent or has just a few items related to stakeholders. |
|
15.0 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCommunication Management Plan |
20.0 to >18.0 ptsExcellent
All stakeholders are listed on the communication management plan and the seven elements are addressed for each stakeholder. |
18.0 to >16.0 ptsCompetent
Most stakeholders are listed on the communication management plan or some of the elements are not addressed for each stakeholder. |
16.0 to >14.0 ptsFair
Some stakeholders are listed on the communication management plan or many elements are not addressed for each stakeholder. |
14.0 to >12.0 ptsPoor
The communication management plan contains very few stakeholders or most elements are not addressed for each stakeholder. |
12.0 to >0 ptsUnacceptable
The communication management plan is not present or does not contain communication information for the stakeholders. |
|
20.0 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeUGB.HCA.CO1SEP19view longer description
threshold: 0.75 pts |
1.0 ptsExcellent: The student’s submission provides a clear demonstration of the project management knowledge areas or process groups as well as business analysis principles related to needs assessment and data collection. |
0.75 ptsCompetent: The student’s submission provides a demonstration of most project management knowledge areas or process groups or most business analysis principles related to needs assessment and data collection. |
0.5 ptsFair: The student’s submission provides a demonstration of most project management knowledge areas or process groups or most business analysis principles related to needs assessment and data collection. |
0.25 ptsPoor: The student’s submission lacks a demonstration of most project management knowledge areas or process groups and the business analysis principles related to needs assessment and data collection. |
0.0 ptsUnacceptable: The student’s submissions does not demonstrate project management knowledge areas, process groups and business analysis principles related to needs assessment and data collection. |
|
1.0 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeUGB.PROJ.A.SkillsProcessGroupsview longer description
threshold: 0.75 pts |
1.0 ptsExcellent: Skills and processes found in the five process groups (initiating, planning, executing, monitoring and controlling, and closing required to be an effective project manager are strongly evident in the student’s submission of the Final Course Project Plan. |
0.75 ptsCompetent: Skills and processes found in the five process groups (initiating, planning, executing, monitoring and controlling, and closing required to be an effective project manager are mostly evident in the student’s submission of the Final Course Project Plan. |
0.5 ptsFair: Skills and processes found in the five process groups (initiating, planning, executing, monitoring and controlling, and closing required to be an effective project manager are somewhat evident in the student’s submission of the Final Course Project Plan. |
0.25 ptsPoor: Skills and processes found in the five process groups (initiating, planning, executing, monitoring and controlling, and closing required to be an effective project manager are only slightly evident in the student’s submission of the Final Course Project Plan. |
0.0 ptsUnacceptable: Skills and processes found in the five process groups (initiating, planning, executing, monitoring and controlling, and closing required to be an effective project manager are not evident in the student’s submission of the Final Course Project Plan. |
|
1.0 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeUGB.PROJ.B.PMToolsview longer description
threshold: 0.75 pts |
1.0 ptsExcellent: An understanding of project management tools to ensure projects are completed on time, on budget and within scope is clearly evident in the student’s Final Course Project Plan submission. |
0.75 ptsCompetent: An understanding of project management tools to ensure projects are completed on time, on budget and within scope is mostly evident in the student’s Final Course Project Plan submission. |
0.5 ptsFair: An understanding of project management tools to ensure projects are completed on time, on budget and within scope is somewhat evident in the student’s Final Course Project Plan submission. |
0.25 ptsPoor: An understanding of project management tools to ensure projects are completed on time, on budget and within scope is only slightly evident in the student’s Final Course Project Plan submission. |
0.0 ptsUnacceptable: An understanding of project management tools to ensure projects are completed on time, on budget and within scope is not evident in the student’s Final Course Project Plan submission. |
|
1.0 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeUGB.PROJ.C.Planning-Procurementview longer description
threshold: 0.75 pts |
1.0 ptsExcellent: The use of strategic planning skills and procurement techniques to ensure quality, cost, and schedule performance measures are met is clearly evident in the student’s Final Course Project Plan submission. |
0.75 ptsCompetent: The use of strategic planning skills and procurement techniques to ensure quality, cost, and schedule performance measures are met is mostly evident in the student’s Final Course Project Plan submission. |
0.5 ptsFair: The use of strategic planning skills and procurement techniques to ensure quality, cost, and schedule performance measures are met is somewhat evident in the student’s Final Course Project Plan submission. |
0.25 ptsPoor: The use of strategic planning skills and procurement techniques to ensure quality, cost, and schedule performance measures are met is only slightly evident in the student’s Final Course Project Plan submission. |
0.0 ptsUnacceptable: The use of strategic planning skills and procurement techniques to ensure quality, cost, and schedule performance measures are met is not evident in the student’s Final Course Project Plan submission. |
|
1.0 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeUGB.PROJ.D.Resource-Comm-Riskview longer description
threshold: 0.75 pts |
1.0 ptsExcellent: The importance of effective human resource management, communication management, and risk management techniques to improve project management is clearly evident in the student’s Final Course Project Plan submission. |
0.75 ptsCompetent: The importance of effective human resource management, communication management, and risk management techniques to improve project management is mostly evident in the student’s Final Course Project Plan submission. |
0.5 ptsFair: The importance of effective human resource management, communication management, and risk management techniques to improve project management is somewhat evident in the student’s Final Course Project Plan submission. |
0.25 ptsPoor: The importance of effective human resource management, communication management, and risk management techniques to improve project management is only slightly evident in the student’s Final Course Project Plan submission. |
0.0 ptsUnacceptable: The importance of effective human resource management, communication management, and risk management techniques to improve project management is not evident in the student’s Final Course Project Plan submission. |
|
1.0 pts |
Total Points: 125.0 |