recommend a strategy and an implementation method to transform a dysfunctional culture.

Organizational Culture

ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE INSTRUCTIONS

Managers perform a vital role in influencing organizational culture. Organizational culture influences the interactions between individuals and groups in achieving organizational goals. It is important that managers be able to identify and implement success strategies to restore a dysfunctional culture to a functional one. In this assignment, students will recommend a strategy and an implementation method to transform a dysfunctional culture.

 

Remember: This assignment and all assignments in this course have a management, not leadership focus. There is a distinct difference between management and leadership. Discuss management, not leadership. The Contemporary Management text only provides basic topical information. As a research-intensive doctoral course, you will need to research current scholarly literature. There is no assignment in this course that can be completed by relying on the text alone.

 

Assignment Requirements

This 1250 words compilation paper will be discussing the following:

 

  1. Recommend at least one key strategy or method that will restore functionality to a dysfunctional organizational culture, where internal distrust and competitive behavior flourishes. Justify your reasoning, with support from scholarly literature and the Bible, stating why this strategy is better than other alternative strategies through comparison and contrast with other strategies. Also discuss how you will implement this success strategy for maximum effectiveness. Be sure to mention some factors that cause dysfunction. (at least 900 words)
  1. Provide new, personal thoughts related to this topic of organizational culture. Give your opinion in the form of new insights that you gained about this topic, demonstrating a synthesis of biblical principles and secular knowledge. Some suggested (not required) questions for reflection: How can spirituality be part of the culture in a non-Christian organization? What are some biblical examples of shaping a customer responsive culture? (at least 100 words)

 

Required Headings

 

Cover page with Topic Title

Abstract

Table of Contents

Introduction

Strategy

Implementation

New Thoughts

Conclusions

References

 

Other Requirements

 

Materials submitted to fulfill requirements in one course may not be submitted in another course. Concerns about the propriety of obtaining outside assistance and acknowledging sources should be addressed to the instructor of the course before the work commences and as necessary as the work proceeds.

 

  • The cover page must include this statement: By submitting this assignment, I attest this submission represents my own work, and not that of another student, scholar, or internet source. I understand I am responsible for knowing and correctly utilizing referencing and bibliographical guidelines.
  • This paper must include at least 7 references from scholarly articles that have publication dates no older than 5 years, in addition to the course textbooks and the Bible. Do not use any books other than the Bible and the 2 course textbooks. Do not cite the management text more than twice in your paper. Do not conduct interviews.
  • In-text citations are required to support your thesis statement, paragraph topic sentences points, statements, issues, arguments, concerns, statements of fact and opinion.
  • The required cover page, abstract, table of contents, introduction, conclusion and reference sections are not included in the required assignment word count but are required as part of your paper.
  • The abstract should be written within a range of 150-250 words. It should not introduce your paper or duplicate your introduction section, but articulates a clear and comprehensive overview of the paper’s content with a focus on your findings and includes your biblical application.
  • The introduction should not be longer than ½ page. It presents a detailed description of the problems and issues central to the case. A thesis statement, with supporting citation should be at the end of your introduction section.
  • Your conclusion section should not be longer than ½ page. It clearly states the answer to the problem which you stated in your introduction.  Sources of information from Wikipedia, dictionaries, and encyclopedia will not be accepted.  Similarity scores must not exceed 20%.
  • Paragraph lengths: Each paragraph should have a topic sentence unless it continues from or provides support to the prior paragraph. A paragraph is defined in this course as being at least 4 sentences in length.
  • The first person may be used in the New Thoughts section. Your opinions should be restricted to this section. All other parts of the assignment must be based on scholarly and biblical literature.
  • Avoid clichés, slang, jargon, exaggerations, abbreviations, figurative language, and language that is too informal and/or too subjective.
  • Submit your final document for grading with file name syntax: Last name, First Initial, Assignment #. For example: Bell, K, Assignment3

 

 

Grading Metrics

 

Consult the accompanying rubric for how your instructor will grade this assignment. Also, any form of plagiarism, including cutting and pasting, will result in zero points for the entire assignment. All quoted materials must be properly cited in current APA format.

 

Submit this Research Paper to the appropriate link for grading by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Sunday of Module/Week 3.

 

Reminder: Submit to your professor for approval, a narrow, focused management topic of interest to you for your Week 6 Annotated Bibliography which will also be used for your Week 7 Literature Review. Your topic should not be less than 4 words and should not be related to leadership. This is an excellent opportunity to review dissertation topics in the LUO dissertation database to get an idea of how to form a doctoral-level research topic.

 

 

 

Organizational Culture Grading Rubric

100 Points

Criteria Levels of Achievement Points Earned
Content

70 %

Advanced Proficient Developing Not present
Recommend at least one key strategy that will restore functionality. Justify your reasoning with support from scholarly literature and the Bible

 

(20 points)

Thoroughly recommended at least one key strategy that will restore functionality. Justified your reasoning with support from scholarly literature and the Bible.

Stated why this strategy is better than other alternative strategies through comparison and contrast with other strategies.

 

(15-20 points)

Satisfactorily recommended at least one key strategy that will restore functionality. Justified your reasoning with support from scholarly literature and the Bible

Stated why this strategy is better than other alternative strategies through comparison and contrast with other strategies.

 

(9-14 points)

Insufficiently recommended at least one key strategy that will restore functionality. Justified your reasoning with support from scholarly literature and the Bible

Minimally stated why this strategy is better than other alternative strategies through comparison and contrast with other strategies.

 

(1-8 points)

Did not

recommend a key strategy that will restore functionality.

 

(0 points)

 
Mention some factors that cause dysfunction

 

(10 points)

Thoroughly mentioned some factors that cause dysfunction.

 

(9-10 points)

Satisfactorily mentioned some factors that cause dysfunction.

 

(6-8 points)

Insufficiently mentioned some factors that cause dysfunction.

 

(1-5 points)

Did not mention factors that cause dysfunction

(0 points)

 
Discuss how you will implement this success strategy for maximum effectiveness

 

(20 points)

Thoroughly discussed how you will implement this success strategy for maximum effectiveness

 

(15-20 points)

Satisfactorily discussed how you will implement this success strategy for maximum effectiveness

 

(9-14 points)

Insufficiently discussed how you will implement this success strategy for maximum effectiveness

(1-8 points)

Did not discuss how you will implement this success strategy for maximum effectiveness

 

(0 points)

 
New insights must demonstrate a synthesis of biblical principles and secular knowledge.

 

(5 points)

New insights thoroughly demonstrated a synthesis of biblical principles and secular knowledge.

 

(4-5 points)

New insights satisfactorily demonstrated a synthesis of biblical principles and secular knowledge.

 

(2-3 points)

New insights insufficiently demonstrated a synthesis of biblical principles and secular knowledge.

(1 point)

New insights did not demonstrate a synthesis of biblical principles and secular knowledge.

 

(0 points)

 
 

Abstract

(5 points)

Thoroughly articulated a clear and comprehensive overview of the paper’s content, linked to management with a focus on your findings.   Key terms, and a biblical application are included.

 

(4-5 points)

Satisfactorily articulated some critical components of the paper, linked to management with a focus on your findings.   Key terms and a biblical application are included.

 

(2-3 points)

Insufficiently articulated critical components of the paper linked to management with a focus on your findings. Key terms and biblical application are not sufficient.

(1 point)

Did not present concepts clearly. Did not provide a comprehensive overview of the paper’s content.  Missing a link to management. No focus on your findings. Missing key terms and a biblical application.

(0 points)

   
Introduction

(5 points)

 

Thoroughly presented a detailed description of the problems and issues central to the assignment. A properly constructed thesis statement with supporting citation is at the end of your introduction section

(4-5 points)

Satisfactorily presented a detailed description of the problems and issues central to the assignment. A constructed thesis statement with supporting citation is at the end of your introduction section.

(2-3 points)

Insufficiently presented a detailed description of the problems and issues central to the assignment. A properly constructed thesis statement with supporting citation is missing from your introduction section

(1 point)

Did not present a detailed description of the problems and issues central to the assignment. A thesis statement is missing from your introduction section.

 

(0 points)

   
 

Conclusion

 

(5 points)

 

Thoroughly stated the answer to the problem which you stated in your introduction.

 

(4-5 points)

Satisfactorily stated the answer to the problem which you stated in your introduction.

(2-3 points)

Insufficiently stated the answer to the problem which you stated in your introduction.

(1 point)

Did not state the answer to the problem which you stated in your introduction.

(0 points)

   
Structure

30%

Advanced Proficient Developing Not present  
 

Mechanics, Composition & Word Count

 

(10 points)

Mechanics, Composition, & Word Count is thorough.

(9-10 points)

Mechanics, Composition, & Word Count is satisfactory.

(6-8 points)

Mechanics, Composition, & Word Count is insufficient

(1-5 points)

There are many errors.

 

 

(0 points)

 
 

APA formatting

 

(5 points)

APA formatting is thorough.

(4-5 points)

APA formatting is satisfactory.

(2-3 points)

APA formatting is insufficient.

(1 point)

APA formatting does not exist.

 

(0 points)

 
References

 

(5 points)

References meet requirements in number and quality.

(4-5 points)

References almost meet requirements in number and quality.

(2-3 points)

References do not meet requirements in number and quality.

(1 point)

Missing references

 

 

(0 points)

 
Citations (10 points) All statements are supported by citations.

(9-10 points)

Many statements are supported by citations.

(6-8 points)

Some statements are supported by citations.

(1-5 points)

Citations are rare, repetitious or non-existent.

(0 points)

 
          Total      /100

 

Instructor’s Comments:

 

 

Answer preview…………………

apa 1849 words

Share this paper
Open Whatsapp chat
1
Hello;
Can we help you?