share your overall impressions after reading your partner’s diagnosis of communication challenges in their critical assignment paper.
share your overall impressions after reading your partner’s diagnosis of communication challenges in their critical assignment paper.
Expectations in your Discussion Posts:
Specific Expectations for the initial Feedback post to your partner:
- a) First, share your overall impressions after reading your partner’s diagnosis of communication challenges in their critical assignment paper.
Then b) second, share your feedback about your partner’s suggestions regarding what needs to change in the organization for there to be an increase in courageous communication. What else would you add or expand upon that your partner may have overlooked? Please be specific and provide a rationale for your suggestions. Students should demonstrate that they are examining their ideas with consideration for the uniqueness of leadership style and specific organizational or industry norms. ****(Due Week 8, Day 3)
Specific Expectations for the Final Reply/Response back to partner: a) After reading the feedback from your partner, post a final comprehensive reply to the feedback given to you by your partner ****(Due Week 8, Day 5).
| Levels of Achievement | |||
| Criteria | Exemplary | Accomplished | Developing |
| Completeness of Initial Peer Feedback Post
Weight 25.00% |
90.00 to 100.00 %
Initial reflection post is fully developed, thoroughly and directly addresses all assignment requirements. Demonstrates clear evidence of understanding of the relevance of the peer paper selected for review. |
80.00 to 89.00 %
Initial post is adequately developed, analysis of requirements sufficiently addresses. Sufficient demonstration of understanding of the relevance of the peer paper selected for review. |
0.00 to 79.00 %
Initial post is vague and/or minimally developed, and/or does not sufficiently demonstrate evidence of understanding the peer paper selected for review. |
| Critical Analysis and Reflection in Initial Peer Feedback Post
Weight 50.00% |
90.00 to 100.00 %
Exemplary critical thinking and analysis of the peer’s circumstance. Specific and relevant suggestions are provided regarding how courageous communication could have been improved and how one could have course corrected. Rationale for suggestions is clear and developed. Clear evidence of examination of nuances that are unique to own leadership style, specific organization behavior, and/or specific industry-sector(s). |
80.00 to 89.00 %
Some critical thinking and insight demonstrated. Adequate specificity and relevance related to enhancing courageous communication and ideas for course correction. Rationale for suggestions is mostly clear and developed. Adequate application of relevance of concepts to own leadership, own organization, and/or specific industry sector(s). |
0.00 to 79.00 %
Critical thinking and insight are not evidenced. Non-specific and loosely relevant ideas for enhancing courageous communication and ideas course correcting. Rationale for suggestions is unclear and undeveloped. Lacks evidence of understanding particular nuances and dynamics of self, organization, and/or industry. |
| Additional Engagement with Partner
Weight 10.00% |
90.00 to 100.00 %
Student comprehensively replies to comments on own paper. |
80.00 to 89.00 %
Student replies minimally to comments on own paper. |
0.00 to 79.00 %
Student may or may not reply to any/all comments on own paper. |
| Writing & APA
Weight 15.00% |
90.00 to 100.00 %
Posts are all well-written, meeting or exceeding appropriate graduate-level academic writing requirements. Assertions are consistently supported with academically appropriate required and supplementary sources. Consistently adheres to all APA citation and reference requirements. |
80.00 to 89.00 %
Posts are all adequately written adequately meeting appropriate graduate-level academic writing requirements. Typos or errors are minimal and infrequent. Assertions are mostly supported with appropriate required sources. Mostly adheres to APA citation and reference requirements. |
0.00 to 79.00 %
One or more posts contains numerous typos, grammar, or syntax errors. Writing and analysis is difficult to understand. Lacks citation and/or references. |
Requirements: 3 pgs
Subject: Management
Hi,
I have attached a copy of my cohorts assignment that needs review.
You just need to review the assignment meeting the criteria above.
Answer preview for the “share your overall impressions after reading your partner’s diagnosis of communication challenges in their critical assignment paper.” essay…………………………
apa 3084 words