The Supreme Court’s Interpretation of Jury Size

Does the 6th Amendment, right to a jury trial, mandate that a jury must have 12 members?

Explain the history of the Court’s interpretation of jury size?

In what historical case did the Court state, “a jury comprised of 12 persons, neither more or less.” What was the Court’s reasoning for making this statement?

Explain the Supreme Court’s interpretation of jury size in their 1979 case.

Please remember to list your references in Bluebook format.

Note that your essay answer should contain a minimum of 350 words.

refs and cite

outline

Answer preview………

Under U.S. law, determinations in many criminal and civil trials are made by a jury. Significant power is vested in this body of ordinary individuals who decide issues of fact and reach a verdict of innocence or guilt based on the evidence. A trial by jury has long been a central principle of the U.S. legal system and has been firmly guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment to the Constitution. While the Supreme Court stated that an impartial jury is a procedural due process right, the Court has been called to define its operative parameters.
The Supreme Court, in its decision of Thompson v. Utah 170 U.S. 343 (1898) stated that “a jury comprised of 12 persons, neither more or less” (Vile & Menez, 2010). The Court, however, overruled Thompson and reconsidered jury size. In Williams v. Florida, 399 U.S…
APA 412 words