Thinking of the trauma that homeless kids face, which type of education is better: traditional schools or schools designed around the problems homeless children face?

Thinking of the trauma that homeless kids face, which type of education is better: traditional schools or schools designed around the problems homeless children face?

When we develop appropriate research questions, then we are able to turn that question into a thesis statement. If you have ever taken written an in-class essay where the teacher gave you a prompt, your job as a student was to re-write the question or prompt as a thesis statement. You then developed that statement into an essay.

TO COMPLETE THIS ASSIGNMENT ANSWER THE FOLLOWING THREE QUESTIONS.

Your job for this assignment is to develop a research question and a potential approach that you will begin to research.

  1. Pick a topic.
  2. Develop a working research question.
  3. Identify three websites and three database sources that you think will provide relevant information for this topic. Put the article titles from the databases and the titles and links for the websites.
  4. Create Works Cited entries for all six items.

Here is my sample question with a few sources. You need six sources, but I gave three examples.

Topic: Homeless Children and Education

  1. Develop a research question about the topic: Thinking of the trauma that homeless kids face, which type of education is better: traditional schools or schools designed around the problems homeless children face?
  2. This is a vague question. What differences do children actually face or do they?
  1. Homeless children have issues that traditional children cannot begin to fathom: no shoes, no food, no shelter, few clothes to change into, and possibly no access to baths or showers.
  2. Therefore, alternative schools should be made available to ensure that all of the needs these children have are met without the fear of being embarrassed or humiliated by children not in this predicament.
  3. Working Thesis: Due to the trauma created by being homeless, alternate schools must be made available to homeless children to provide for their health, general welfare, and education while protecting them from the scrutiny and possible humiliation from traditional school students.
  1. Now I need to ask myself: Is this what I really want to cover on this paper? Look at the thesis. Does my thesis statement cover what I intend to discuss? Take a look at the parts.
  1. Health needs of homeless kids
  2. General needs of homeless kids
  3. Education of homeless kids
  4. Protection from scrutiny
  1. I’ve now established four areas that my paper will cover in this research paper. These areas will probably take at least a full page with evidence, especially when I combine case studies and narratives from real parents, children and school staff and teachers along with statistics across the U. S.
  2. How will I do this? What types of evidence and appeals will work in this paper?
    1. Examine homeless schools – Thomas J. Pappas, Pappas School House Foundation, Children First Academy, traditional schools with high numbers of transient students
    2. Ask to interview teachers, parents and possibly students
    3. Read Education journal articles on this topic
    4. Psychology journals
    5. U. S. Dept. of Education
    6. CDC
    7. Emotional appeal – kids stories and statistics
    8. Logical appeal – statistics on success and prison
    9. Ethical appeal – don’t allow the writing to become too emotional and focus on solving the problem not blaming people or getting too caught up in an overly emotional story
  1. Prepare for the rebuttal. What arguments do I need to address from the opposition? What counterarguments do I need to make, and what evidence will support my counterarguments?
    1. Opposition’s First Argument: Including these students will teach traditional acceptance and empathy. I need to provide a counterargument that establishes the emotional and physical needs of the students outweigh inclusion. I can supply statistics on bullying when it comes to poverty. I can students saying that they felt more comfortable at special schools.
  1. Opposition’s Second Argument: Economics – too costly to run homeless schools and regular schools. There are not enough students to warrant spending the extra money on it. I will provide the statistics on the success rates of homeless kids in traditional schools versus schools for the homeless. Many states calculate the number of prison cells needed by 3rd-grade test scores. Even if people do not care about the future of these kids, the potential costs of imprisonment are higher than ensuring that these kids are educated and productive citizens. I will also provide statistics on prison costs.
    1. Opposition’s Third Argument: This is a form of segregation. This is not deliberate segregation based upon race or religion. This is an opportunity for kids with specific needs to go to a school that can meet those needs, like a school for the blind or the deaf.
  1. Conclusion

Works Cited

National Coalition to End Homelessness, 2020, www.nationalhomeless.org (Links to an external site.).

“Public Schools Report Over 1.5 Million Homeless Children and Youth.” School House Connection, Jan. 2020, https://www.schoolhouseconnection.org/public-schools-report-over-1-5-million-homeless-children-and-youth/ (Links to an external site.).

“Welcome to the Homeless Education Program” Arizona Department of Education, 2020, https://www.azed.gov/homeless/ (Links to an external site.)

Answer preview “Thinking of the trauma that homeless kids face, which type of education is better: traditional schools or schools designed around the problems homeless children face?” essay………………..

Thinking of the trauma that homeless kids faceapa 239 words

Click the Purchase button now to download full answer for the“Thinking of the trauma that homeless kids face, which type of education is better: traditional schools or schools designed around the problems homeless children face?” Page

Share this paper
Open Whatsapp chat
1
Hello;
Can we help you?