Why are you preparing this part of the Academic and Professional Success Plan? What can the reader expect to find in this Assignment?
Academic and Professional Success Plan Template
Hello Class,
The efforts this week will be placed on developing a curriculum vitae. If the difference between a curriculum vitae and a resume has not been distinguished please do so prior to preparing this week’s assignment. Why are you preparing this part of the Academic and Professional Success Plan? What can the reader expect to find in this Assignment? The Curriculum Vitae is being prepared based on your current education and experience, not your future experience.
Hello Class,
During the preparation of this weeks Assignment make sure to develop a Curriculum Vitae instead of a Resume. Follow the Rubric explicitly.
Also think of the Academic and Professional Success Plan Template as a document you plan to use for your next job. It needs to be impressive. Do not think of this tool as an assignment for a grade, think of it as one of the items that will impress the person who will interview you for your next job.
Have you corrected all of the errors in the template from previous weeks? Are all of the individual assignments now in one document (the template). Does the document look impressive to you? Step out of your comfort zone to the next level. Would you hire you based on the portfolio established in this course?
| Using the Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Template, address the following:
· Develop a curriculum vitae (CV) based on your current education and professional background. · Write a statement identifying your professional development goals. · Write a statement proposing how you might align one or more of your professional development goals with the University’s emphasis on social change. |
Points Range:86 (86.00%) – 95 (95.00%)
A fully developed and accurate curriculum vitae based on current education and professional background is provided. The response clearly identifies and accurately states in detail professional development goals. The response clearly and accurately states in detail how to accurately and appropriately align one or more of the professional goals provided to the University’s emphasis on social change. |
Points Range:76 (76.00%) – 85 (85.00%)
A partially developed curriculum vitae based on current education and professional background is provided. The response partially identifies and states professional development goals. The response partially states how to align one or more of the professional goals provided to the University’s emphasis on social change. |
Points Range:67 (67.00%) – 75 (75.00%)
A vague or inaccurate developed curriculum vitae based on current education and professional background is provided. The response vaguely or inaccurately identifies and states professional development goals. The response vaguely or inaccurately states how to align one or more of the professional goals provided to the University’s emphasis on social change. |
Points Range:0 (0.00%) – 66 (66.00%)
A vague and inaccurately developed curriculum vitae based on current education and professional background is provided, or is missing. The response vaguely and inaccurately identifies and states professional development goals, or is missing. The response vaguely and inaccurately states how to align one or more of the professional goals provided to the University’s emphasis on social change, or is missing. |
| Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation |
Points Range:5 (5.00%) – 5 (5.00%)
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. |
Points Range:4 (4.00%) – 4 (4.00%)
Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. |
Points Range:3.5 (3.50%) – 3.5 (3.50%)
Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. |
Points Range:0 (0.00%) – 3 (3.00%)
Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. |
NAME:NURS_6003_MODULE05_WEEK09_ASSIGNMENT_RUBRIC
This is the last assignment Rubric
| Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | |
| Using the Week 4 Part 4 section of your Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Template presented in the Resources, conduct an analysis of the elements of the research article you identified. Be sure to include the following:
· The topic of interest you have selected. · Correctly formatted APA citation of the article you selected, along with link or search details. · Identify a professional practice use of the theories/concepts presented in the article. |
Points Range:18 (18.00%) – 20 (20.00%)
The response clearly identifies the topic of interest selected. The response accurately and completely provides a citation of the article selected, including an accurate and complete link or thorough search details. The response clearly identifies and describes in detail a professional practice use of the theories/concepts presented in the article. |
Points Range:16 (16.00%) – 17 (17.00%)
The response partially identifies the topic of interest selected. The response provides a partial citation of the article selected, including a partial link or search details. The response partially identifies and describes a professional practice use of the theories/concepts presented in the article. |
Points Range:14 (14.00%) – 15 (15.00%)
The response vaguely identifies the topic of interest selected. The response vaguely or inaccurately provides a citation of the article selected, including vague or inaccurate search details. The response vaguely or inaccurately identifies and describes a professional practice use of the theories/concepts presented in the article. |
Points:5 (5.00%)
Points Range:0 (0.00%) – 13 (13.00%) The response vaguely and inaccurately identifies the topic of interest selected, or is missing. The response vaguely and inaccurately provides a citation of the article selected, including vague and inaccurate search details, or is missing. The response vaguely and inaccurately identifies and describes a professional practice use of the theories/concepts presented in the article, or is missing. Feedback:Comments on the paper. The Assignment is incomplete or part of the Assignment was not submitted. Please revisit the directives of the Assignment. |
| Analysis of the article using the Research Analysis Matrix section of the template.
· Write a one-paragraph justification explaining whether or not you would recommend the use of this article to inform professional practice. |
Points Range:18 (18.00%) – 20 (20.00%)
The response clearly and accurately provides a detailed analysis of the article using the Research Analysis Matrix section of the template. The response clearly and accurately explains in detail the justification of whether or not to recommend the use of the article to inform professional practice. |
Points Range:16 (16.00%) – 17 (17.00%)
The response provides a partial analysis of the article using the Research Analysis Matrix section of the template. The response partially explains the justification of whether or not to recommend the use of the article to inform professional practice. |
Points Range:14 (14.00%) – 15 (15.00%)
The response provides a vague or inaccurate analysis of the article using the Research Analysis Matrix section of the template. The response vaguely or inaccurately explains the justification of whether or not to recommend the use of the article to inform professional practice. |
Points:5 (5.00%)
Points Range:0 (0.00%) – 13 (13.00%) The response provides a vague and inaccurate analysis of the article using the Research Analysis Matrix section of the template, or is missing. The response vaguely and inaccurately explains the justification of whether or not to recommend the use of the article to inform professional practice, or is missing. Feedback:See Above |
| Write a 2-3 paragraph summary that you will add to your Academic Success and Professional Development Plan that includes the following:
· Describe your approach to identifying and analyzing peer-reviewed research. · Identify at least two strategies that you would use that you found to be effective in finding peer-reviewed research. · Identify at least one resource you intend to use in the future to find peer-reviewed research. |
Points Range:41 (41.00%) – 45 (45.00%)
The response clearly and accurately describes in detail the approach to identifying and analyzing peer-reviewed research. The response clearly identifies and accurately describes in detail at least two strategies used to be effective in finding peer-reviewed research. The response provides a complete, detailed, and specific synthesis of at least one outside resource that may be used in the future to find peer-reviewed research. The response fully integrates at least 1 outside resource and 2-3 course specific resources that fully supports the summary provided. |
Points:36 (36.00%)
Points Range:36 (36.00%) – 40 (40.00%) The response partially describes the approach to identifying and analyzing peer-reviewed research. The response partially identifies and describes at least two strategies used to be effective in finding peer-reviewed research. The response provides an accurate synthesis of at least one outside resource that may be used in the future to find peer-reviewed research. The response integrates at least 1 outside resource and 2-3 course specific resources that support the summary provided. Feedback:Comments on the paper. |
Points Range:32 (32.00%) – 35 (35.00%)
The response vaguely or inaccurately describes the approach to identifying and analyzing peer-reviewed research. The response vaguely or inaccurately identifies and describes at least two strategies used to be effective in finding peer-reviewed research. The response vaguely or inaccurately synthesizes at least one outside resource that may be used in the future to find peer-reviewed research. The response minimally integrates resources that may support the summary provided. |
Points Range:0 (0.00%) – 31 (31.00%)
The response vaguely and inaccurately describes the approach to identifying and analyzing peer-reviewed research, or is missing. The response vaguely and inaccurately identifies and describes at least two strategies used to be effective in finding peer-reviewed research, or is missing. The response fails to integrate any resources that may be used in the future to find peer-reviewed research to support the summary provided, or is missing. |
| Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization:
Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria. |
Points Range:5 (5.00%) – 5 (5.00%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria. |
Points Range:4 (4.00%) – 4 (4.00%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive. |
Points:3.5 (3.50%)
Points Range:3.5 (3.50%) – 3.5 (3.50%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%- 79% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic. |
Points Range:0 (0.00%) – 3 (3.00%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided. |
| Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation |
Points Range:5 (5.00%) – 5 (5.00%)
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. |
Points:4 (4.00%)
Points Range:4 (4.00%) – 4 (4.00%) Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. |
Points Range:3.5 (3.50%) – 3.5 (3.50%)
Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. |
Points Range:0 (0.00%) – 3 (3.00%)
Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. |
| Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. | Points Range:5 (5.00%) – 5 (5.00%)
Uses correct APA format with no errors. |
Points Range:4 (4.00%) – 4 (4.00%)
Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors. |
Points:3.5 (3.50%)
Points Range:3.5 (3.50%) – 3.5 (3.50%) Contains several (3-4) APA format errors. |
Points Range:0 (0.00%) – 3 (3.00%)
Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. |
Raw Total: 57.00 (of 100)
FEEDBACK TO LEARNER
The Assignment was not completed as directed. Please see the Rubric for week seven Assignment. Also please see the directions for completing the Assignment.
Subject: Masters Nursing
Education Bachelors in Science ( Registered Nurse)
Work experience: Med Surg and Hospice
Special skills End of Life Care and symptoms management
Answer preview……………………………….
apa 1741 words